Take a look at our newest merchandise
Each auto present brings a parade of untamed ideas that make us dream, however most of them are destined to stay simply that — desires. But each every now and then, automakers unveil one thing that feels so proper, so production-ready, that it’s nearly painful when it doesn’t make it to showrooms.
These aren’t the wacky, wheels-optional design research which can be by no means meant for the street. These are the automobiles that had all of the items in place: compelling designs, confirmed know-how, enthusiastic reception, and real enterprise instances.
They had been those that received away, and admittedly, the automotive world is rather less attention-grabbing with out them.
Buick Avista
Bear in mind when Buick made everybody do a double-take? The Avista was that second, captured in carbon fiber and flowing sheet metallic.
This beautiful rear-drive coupe packed a 400-horsepower twin-turbo V-6, rode on the confirmed Camaro platform, and appeared like nothing else on the street in 2016. It gained design awards, generated huge buzz on the Detroit Auto Present, and even had GM executives speaking manufacturing prospects. The platform was there, the engine existed within the Cadillac CT6, and the general public response was overwhelming. But Buick finally deemed it only a design research, leaving fans to surprise what may need been.
With crossovers dominating their lineup, Buick may’ve used this halo automobile to show they weren’t nearly snug transportation for retirees.
Chrysler ME 4-Twelve
This is likely to be the wildest “nearly” in American automotive historical past. Chrysler took a Mercedes-AMG V-12, added 4 turbochargers, stuffed all 850 horsepower right into a carbon-fiber chassis weighing simply 2,880 kilos, and created one thing that might’ve given Ferrari nightmares.
The numbers had been insane: zero to 60 in 2.9 seconds and an estimated 248 mph high pace. This wasn’t vapor: Chrysler truly constructed working prototypes and had magazines testing them at Laguna Seca by late 2004. The corporate even mentioned manufacturing runs of 100 to 2,000 items. Then actuality hit. Mercedes reportedly wasn’t thrilled about Chrysler outperforming the SLR McLaren utilizing their engine, and the enterprise case crumbled.
It stays the final word “what if” from the DaimlerChrysler period.
Audi Quattro Idea
Celebrating 30 years of Quattro all-wheel drive, Audi unveiled this gorgeous tribute to the unique rally legend. Constructed on a shortened RS5 platform, it weighed simply 2,866 kilos and packed the two.5-liter turbocharged five-cylinder from the RS3, tuned to 403 horsepower.
The design completely captured the spirit of the Ur-Quattro whereas feeling totally fashionable. Rumors swirled about restricted manufacturing, and the automotive press virtually begged Audi to construct it. As an alternative, we received design cues that trickled into different Audis just like the TT, however no non secular successor to the automobile that made Audi’s repute.
Given how the basic Quattro values have skyrocketed, a contemporary interpretation would’ve been gold for collectors and fans alike.
Nissan IDx
This retro-modern coupe was Nissan’s reply to the BRZ/FR-S twins, channeling the beloved 510 sedan from the Nineteen Seventies into a recent rear-drive package deal. With an estimated 200-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder, it will’ve slotted completely into the inexpensive sports activities automobile section.
Nissan flirted with manufacturing for years, producing huge curiosity at automobile reveals and refusing to rule it out publicly. The issue? Nissan didn’t have the manufacturing capability for one more rear-drive mannequin, and the enterprise case appeared dangerous with established rivals already within the section.
It’s notably irritating as a result of Nissan’s sports activities automobile lineup feels incomplete with out an entry-level possibility beneath the Z, and the IDx may’ve been that good gateway automobile.
Cadillac Elmiraj
Cadillac’s Artwork and Science design language reached its pinnacle with the Elmiraj, a surprising two-door coupe unveiled at Pebble Seaside. This wasn’t some pie-in-the-sky fantasy: it was sized to compete with the Mercedes S-Class Coupe and will’ve labored as a flagship sedan platform too.
The design was production-feasible, the proportions had been good, and it represented every part Cadillac aspired to be: daring, elegant, and unmistakably American. But regardless of Cadillac touting it as the way forward for the model, it by no means influenced manufacturing fashions in any significant method.
Cadillac spent years trying to find a design identification once they already had it proper right here, gathering mud after one spectacular weekend in California.
Mercedes-Benz C112
Recent off World Sportscar Championship victories, Mercedes introduced this mid-engine supercar with a 6.0-liter V-12, energetic aerodynamics, and know-how that was genuinely futuristic for 1991. It was basically a road-going counterpart to the gorgeous Sauber C11 race automobile, full with gullwing doorways and efficiency to match any supercar of its period.
The issue? The chief who championed the venture left the corporate earlier than it may attain manufacturing, and with out that inside assist, the costly improvement program died.
Mercedes wouldn’t return to the mid-engine supercar formulation till many years later, leaving a notable hole of their heritage between the basic gullwings and the fashionable SLS/AMG GT line.
Nissan Mid4-II
Think about if Nissan had crushed Honda to market with a mid-engine Japanese supercar. The Mid4-II was production-ready in 1987 — absolutely engineered, street-legal, and constructed from manufacturing tooling. It featured a mid-mounted twin-turbo V-6 making 330 horsepower, all-wheel drive, four-wheel steering, and gorgeous seems to be.
This might’ve arrived two to 4 years earlier than the NSX redefined what a supercar could possibly be. As an alternative, Nissan hesitated, reportedly as a result of the automobile appeared higher than it drove in early testing. By the point they might’ve refined it, Honda had stolen their thunder, and the second handed.
The Mid4-II stays an enchanting “what may’ve been” within the supercar timeline.
Ford Shelby GR-1
Ford developed two chassis when creating the 2004 Shelby Cobra Idea, and the GR-1 was the Daytona-inspired coupe model. Powered by a 6.4-liter V-10 making 605 horsepower, this aluminum-bodied magnificence may’ve been America’s reply to European grand tourers.
With a six-speed handbook sending energy to the rear wheels, it had all of the components for a correct driver’s automobile. Ford was already tooled up for restricted manufacturing from the Cobra Idea improvement, making the enterprise case appear viable. But the GR-1 remained a one-off, and Ford as a substitute targeted on the 2005 GT revival.
Whereas the GT is iconic, there was undoubtedly room within the lineup for each, particularly given the totally different market positions they might’ve occupied.
Lotus Eterne
When Lotus unveiled 5 idea automobiles on the 2010 Paris Motor Present, the Eterne was probably the most stunning: a four-door sedan with killer seems to be and a 5.0-liter supercharged V-8. This was Lotus saying they might do greater than light-weight sports activities automobiles, and the design backed up that ambition.
The proportions had been elegant, the stance was aggressive, and the thought of a Lotus sedan that might compete with Porsche’s Panamera was genuinely thrilling. Sadly, like the opposite 4 ideas proven that day, it was wildly formidable for a corporation Lotus’s measurement.
Monetary realities meant none of them reached manufacturing, however the Eterne deserved a greater destiny than being remembered as a part of Lotus’s most optimistic — and finally unfulfilled — product offensive.
Ferrari Mythos
Designed by Pininfarina utilizing Testarossa underpinnings, the Mythos was the open-top Ferrari that nearly was. Ferrari by no means made a correct Testarossa convertible for manufacturing, and this could’ve been it: a surprising wedge-shaped roadster with a 4.9-liter flat-12 making 390 horsepower.
Weighing simply 2,756 kilos due to light-weight composite development, it blended Nineteen Sixties retro styling with late-Eighties edge completely. Whereas Ferrari finally constructed only one instance (now owned by a non-public collector), and its affect appeared within the F50’s design, fans deserved the possibility to personal one.
The Testarossa platform was already paid for, and a restricted manufacturing run wouldn’t have been technically difficult.
Lamborghini Estoque
A four-door Lamborghini sounds commonplace as we speak, however again in 2008, the Estoque was radical. This sedan idea featured the Gallardo’s 5.2-liter V-10 and smooth proportions that recommended movement even standing nonetheless. Lamborghini toured it round auto reveals, buyer response was enthusiastic, and reviews recommended a 2011 manufacturing date.
Then… nothing.
Years handed with no Estoque, and Lamborghini finally selected the Urus SUV route as a substitute once they lastly wanted a four-door mannequin. The Estoque would’ve competed with the Ferrari FF and Porsche Panamera in a genuinely thrilling section, and whereas the Urus is worthwhile, the Estoque would’ve been correctly particular.
Lamborghini Miura Idea
Celebrating 40 years of the unique Miura, Lamborghini created this beautiful inexperienced idea designed by Walter de Silva. It captured every part stunning concerning the unique whereas feeling up to date, however CEO Stephan Winkelmann firmly acknowledged that retro design wasn’t Lamborghini’s route.
Quick ahead to as we speak, and Lamborghini has embraced heritage styling in numerous particular editions, making Winkelmann’s absolute rejection of retro appear untimely. A restricted manufacturing run celebrating Lamborghini’s most stunning creation would’ve been welcomed by collectors, and the automobile had show-stopping presence.
Generally honoring your historical past doesn’t imply dwelling up to now — it means bringing your finest concepts ahead into the current.
Conclusion
These ideas symbolize extra than simply missed alternatives: they’re glimpses into alternate automotive timelines the place producers took totally different dangers. What’s notably irritating is that many of those automobiles had been genuinely production-feasible, not wild fantasies requiring unobtanium or physics-defying know-how.
That they had platforms, powertrains, and public enthusiasm, but forms, timing, or chilly calculations killed them. The automotive panorama could be extra numerous and thrilling if even half these ideas had made it to manufacturing. Nonetheless, they serve an vital goal: reminding us what’s doable when designers and engineers push boundaries, even when the accountants finally have the ultimate phrase.
Who is aware of — possibly a few of these concepts are simply ready for the best second to return…
