
Try our newest merchandise
We’re journalists, so we get it. Nothing sells clicks fairly like a superb old school American automotive catastrophe story. Whether or not it’s exploding gasoline tanks, spontaneous combustion, or transmissions that determine to take unscheduled holidays, the automotive world loves a superb cautionary story. Nevertheless, typically this results in some sensational slander and, in consequence, the web’s collective reminiscence will get somewhat… inventive with the details, we’ll say.
You understand how it goes: One man’s cousin’s neighbor’s Pontiac does one thing bizarre, and all of a sudden each discussion board warrior is an skilled on why Detroit can’t construct an honest automotive. Earlier than you knew it, completely good automobiles have been getting dragged by the mud more durable than a Camaro at a Florida mud lavatory. It’s time we took a glance again at a few of the American automobiles that fell sufferer to overblown dramatics to provide them a little bit of automotive redemption.
How We Picked These Automotive Underdogs
To make this listing, a automotive needed to meet three standards that might make any protection legal professional proud. First, it wanted a genuinely horrible fame that caught round like that one buddy who by no means pays for gasoline. We’re speaking about automobiles that folks nonetheless received’t purchase at public sale as a result of they’re satisfied they’ll spontaneously combust or rework right into a pile of rust in a single day.
Second, the precise knowledge needed to inform a utterly totally different story from the horror tales floating round. We dug into recall numbers, insurance coverage claims, and precise incident reviews – you recognize, boring stuff like details and statistics.
Lastly, the dangerous fame needed to be demonstrably overblown, whether or not as a consequence of media sensationalism, web echo chambers, or simply plain old school automotive mythology that refuses to die.
So buckle up and prepare to revisit some American rides that you just as soon as feared for all of the fallacious causes.
Pontiac Fiero (1984-1988): The “Flaming” Sports activities Automotive That Actually Wasn’t


The Fiero was a reasonably sleek-looking mid-engine sports activities automotive that allegedly had a behavior of turning right into a rolling barbecue pit. In case you believed the tales, each Fiero was principally a Molotov cocktail on wheels, simply ready for the precise second to recreate the Chicago Hearth. The web is completely awful with tales of Fieros spontaneously combusting quicker than your cash on the mechanic.
However that wasn’t the true story. GM acquired precisely 260 reviews of engine fires out of roughly 370,000 Fieros produced. That’s a hearth price of about 0.07% – statistically, you’re extra more likely to get struck by lightning whereas holding a profitable lottery ticket (most likely). The fires have been primarily restricted to 1984 fashions with a selected connecting rod situation that was rapidly recognized and stuck. By comparability, the up to date Porsche 911 had the next hearth price, however someway no person was calling Stuttgart a hearth hazard. The Fiero’s fame was severely broken, worse than the three automobiles that truly caught hearth.
Ford Pinto (1971-1980): The Exploding Financial system Automotive That Largely Didn’t


The Ford Pinto has turn into the poster baby for company negligence and exploding gasoline tanks, immortalized in enterprise faculty case research and late-night TV jokes. In accordance with fashionable lore, Pintos have been principally automotive IEDs, able to detonate on the slightest rear-end bump. Hollywood even obtained in on the motion, utilizing Pintos as cinematic shorthand for “automotive that can undoubtedly explode on this chase scene.”
Actuality examine time: Whereas the Pinto did have a design flaw that made gas tank ruptures doable in extreme rear-end collisions, the precise numbers inform a unique story. The Nationwide Freeway Site visitors Security Administration’s personal knowledge confirmed that Pintos have been concerned in about 27 fire-related fatalities over 9 years of manufacturing – a tragic statistic, however one that’s statistically similar to different small automobiles of the period. The Toyota Corolla, Datsun 1200, and AMC Gremlin all had comparable or increased fire-related demise charges, however someway no person was making jokes about exploding Corollas (simply doesn’t have that very same zing to it). The Pinto turned the scapegoat for a whole trade’s questions of safety.
Chevrolet Corvair (1960-1969): Unsafe at Any Popularity


Ralph Nader’s 1965 ebook “Unsafe at Any Velocity” turned the Chevrolet Corvair into automotive public enemy primary, portray it as a demise entice that dealt with like a buying cart filled with bowling balls. The rear-engine structure was supposedly so harmful that driving one was tantamount to enjoying Russian roulette with physics. For many years, mentioning the Corvair in well mannered firm was like citing your ex at a marriage.
The reality? Impartial testing by each the Division of Transportation and personal organizations discovered that the Corvair’s dealing with traits have been truly similar to different automobiles of its period, together with the beloved Volkswagen Beetle (which had the identical rear-engine, swing-axle setup that Nader criticized). The 1965-1969 fashions, with their improved suspension design, have been truly fairly good handlers. Skilled drivers praised the Corvair’s steadiness and responsiveness, and plenty of examples competed efficiently in racing. The Corvair paid the value for being totally different in an period when totally different equaled suspicious.
Cadillac Cimarron (1982-1988): The Luxurious Automotive That Wasn’t Luxurious Sufficient


The Cadillac Cimarron will get roasted more durable than a marshmallow at summer time camp, accused of being nothing greater than a Chevrolet Cavalier with leather-based seats and delusions of grandeur. Automotive lovers like to level and snigger at it as the right instance of GM’s badge-engineering gone fallacious, calling it the whole lot from “faux luxurious” to “automotive fraud.” It’s turn into the punchline that writes itself every time somebody desires to bash GM’s Eighties decision-making.
However maintain up! Whereas the Cimarron wasn’t precisely setting luxurious benchmarks, it wasn’t the entire catastrophe everybody makes it out to be. It truly bought moderately nicely for what it was: a compact luxurious automotive in an period when most luxurious automobiles have been nonetheless boat-sized gasoline guzzlers. The later fashions (particularly 1985 and past) had real enhancements over the bottom Cavalier, together with higher supplies, totally different suspension tuning, and extra highly effective engines. Positive, it wasn’t a BMW 3 Sequence, however it was additionally half the value. The Cimarron’s largest sin wasn’t being a foul automotive; it was carrying a Cadillac badge when individuals anticipated one thing utterly totally different.
AMC Pacer (1975-1980): The Huge-Physique Marvel That Wasn’t That Huge


The AMC Pacer will get mocked because the “flying fishbowl” – an oddly proportioned, gas-guzzling mistake that supposedly dealt with like a fridge on curler skates. Web commenters like to bash its uncommon styling and declare it was some type of automotive fever dream that ought to have by no means left the drafting board. It’s turn into shorthand for “bizarre Seventies design gone fallacious,” proper up there with shag carpeting and popcorn ceilings.
Right here’s the factor: The Pacer was truly forward of its time in some ways. Its broad stance and low heart of gravity made it surprisingly secure and protected – it was one of many first automobiles designed particularly round occupant safety. The weird proportions that everybody mocks? They have been the results of critical aerodynamic and security engineering. Motor Pattern even named it Automotive of the Yr in 1975, praising its modern design and glorious visibility. The Pacer’s actual drawback was being too bizarre for its personal good in an period when automotive conservatism dominated the day. It was like that buddy who began listening to new wave as an alternative of disco proper as 1980 hit. You pay attention again now and surprise why you ever thought that was a foul factor.
Ford Edsel (1958-1960): The Advertising and marketing Catastrophe That Was Truly Fairly First rate


The Ford Edsel has turn into synonymous with spectacular enterprise failure, utilized in MBA applications because the textbook instance of how to not launch a product. Everybody “is aware of” the Edsel was a horrible automotive that no person wished, with styling so dangerous it made individuals bodily in poor health. It’s been known as the whole lot from “an Oldsmobile sucking a lemon” to “automotive beginning defect,” and its title has turn into company shorthand for costly errors.
The fact is that the Edsel was truly a reasonably competent automotive that obtained caught within the excellent storm of dangerous timing and worse advertising and marketing. The automotive itself was well-engineered, sharing elements with profitable Ford and Mercury fashions. Highway checks of the time praised its efficiency, consolation, and construct high quality. The notorious “horse collar” grille? It was truly primarily based on in depth market analysis exhibiting that folks wished extra distinctive styling. The Edsel’s failure had extra to do with financial recession, supplier issues, and overly aggressive gross sales projections than any inherent flaws within the automotive itself. It turned a punchline, however it actually deserved higher.
Chevrolet Vega (1971-1977): The Rust Bucket That Wasn’t At all times Rusty


The Chevrolet Vega will get completely roasted for being a rust-prone, engine-destroying catastrophe that supposedly fell aside quicker than a home of playing cards in a hurricane. Automotive boards are filled with horror tales about Vegas that rusted by earlier than the primary fee was due, or engines that determined to grab up only for the enjoyable of it. It’s turn into the go-to punchline every time somebody desires to bash Seventies American high quality management.
Whereas early Vegas did have some professional points with rust and engine sturdiness (thanks, rushed growth schedule!), the issues have been largely mounted by the 1974 mannequin 12 months. Later Vegas have been truly fairly respectable little automobiles with improved rust safety and extra dependable engines. The automotive received Motor Pattern’s Automotive of the Yr in 1971 and was praised for its European-influenced styling and dealing with. Many Vegas went on to stay lengthy, productive lives, however no person writes web posts in regards to the Vegas that ran for 200,000 miles. The dangerous fame caught like rust on a Wisconsin winter beater, lengthy after the precise issues have been solved. Ugh, why even hassle?
The Verdict: Don’t At all times Imagine the Hype


Right here’s the factor about automotive reputations: they’re stickier than summer time asphalt and about as laborious to vary as your uncle’s political views at Thanksgiving dinner. As soon as a automotive is labeled as a “catastrophe,” its fame tends to observe it round like a foul odor, whatever the precise details. These seven American automobiles obtained caught within the crossfire of sensationalized reporting, web echo chambers, and good old school automotive prejudice.
The ethical of the story? Possibly don’t imagine the whole lot you learn on web boards, and undoubtedly don’t base your car-buying selections on decades-old horror tales that will or might not be true. Typically a automotive’s worst enemy isn’t rust, hearth, or mechanical failure – it’s its personal fame. These Detroit “disasters” show that within the automotive world, notion isn’t all the time actuality, and typically the very best automobiles are those everybody tells you to keep away from.